Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Navistar, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 13, 2024No. 1:23-cv-16070Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JENNIFER SHAW, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 23 C 16070 ) NAVISTAR, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: Before the Court is Defendant Navistar, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Jennifer Shaw’s First Amended Collective Action Complaint. For the following reasons, the motion is granted-in-part and denied-in-part. BACKGROUND The following facts come from the first amended complaint and are presumed true for purposes of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API