Legal Opinion

State v. Weiker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1985No. 14515PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

This is the second appeal on three convictions and sentences for controlled substances distributions. See State v. Weiker, 342 N.W.2d 7 (S.D.1983) (Weiker I). We affirmed the convictions but reversed the sentences and remanded. Id. A resen-tencing hearing was conducted, and new evidence was taken. Kenneth Weiker was then sentenced to serve three concurrent eighty year terms. We affirm the sentence.

We must first review Weiker I. Did this Court determine that Weiker was capable of rehabilitation and mandate that he be given an opportunity for rehabilitation on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Barnwell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API