Legal Opinion
U-Haul Co. of Eastern Missouri v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1993No. 62362PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
U-Haul appeals the judgment of the trial court which upheld the holding of the Heritage and Urban Design Commission of St. Louis City (hereinafter Heritage Commission or Commission) that U-Haul could not cover approximately 45% of a building owned by it with metal siding. We reverse.
The building in question is used by U-Haul as a warehouse in which its customers may lease space for the storage of property. The building is located near Kingshighway Boulevard and 1-44 in the northwest quadrant of the intersection. The building was designed by Harris Armstrong, a prominent St. Louis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Central Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fitzgerald v. City of Maryland HeightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lafayette Park Baptist Church v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- City of Festus v. WernerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barry Service Agency Co. v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Estate of Tippett v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Conner v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Conner v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009