Legal Opinion

Nall v. Bill Heard Chevrolet Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1999No. A99A0583PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Ruthie L. Nall appeals from the trial court’s order granting Bill Heard Chevrolet Company (Bill Heard) summary judgment on Nall’s complaint alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo and the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Matjoulis v. Integon Gen.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Brown v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Mayomi v. Portman Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pirkle v. Robson Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Hunter v. Werner Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Bassett v. Jasper Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Neal Pope, Inc. v. GarlingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Ward-Poag v. Fulton County.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API