Legal Opinion

Erback v. Donald

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1943No. 14488PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

The parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.

On May 21, 1941, defendant purchased the property in controversy from W. J. Donald, assuming the payment of certain lien indebtedness outstanding against the *291property. Said indebtedness was owned by plaintiff, J. M. Donald. By an agreement in writing signed by plaintiff J. M. Donald, by W. J. Donald, and by defendant H. J. Erback, dated May 21, 1941, the parties agreed that such indebtedness should be paid at the rate of $125 per month. On or about March 1, 1942, defendant Erback enlisted in the United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. CharpiotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. J. Williams & Co. v. VerneTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Phillips v. the MacCabeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Kendall v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Burns v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Johnson v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Humphrey v. Ahlschlager, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Stanley v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API