Manby v. Sweet Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen
This is an action upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant has sued out this writ, and applies for a supersedeas.
The note in question is dated July 1, 1911, is in the principal sum of $280, and was due six months after its date. Endorsed on the back of the note is the following: “Dec. 27, 1917, paid on the within note, $20.00.”
For a first separate defense the defendant denied that he paid $20 or any other sum of money on the note, and further alleged that the cause of action stated in the complaint did not accrue within six years before the commencement of this action.
There…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Stone v. Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Capek v. MonahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- MacGinnis v. PickettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.