Legal Opinion

MacGinnis v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 24, 1942No. 14,880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This action was instituted in the district court of Yuma County September 7, 1938 on a promissory note by the assignee of the payee. Answering, defendant set up three defenses: First, after admitting the execution of the note, a general denial was pleaded; second, full payment, and a third defense denied the payment of Ten Dollars on July 17, 1933 (hereinafter referred to) and pleaded the statute of limitations.

Plaintiff introduced in evidence the note in sui.t. It was dated January 19, 1927, was for the principal sum of $1,400.00, and was made payable to the order of W. D. MacGinnis six…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kendall v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  5. Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capek v. MonahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API