United States v. Santiago
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT RICHARD SANTIAGO’S MOTION TO COMPEL THE GOVERNMENT TO ELECT ONE COUNT OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT [# 267] BECAUSE THE INDICTMENT IS MULTIPLICITOUS
Blackburn, Judge.
The matter before me is Defendant Richard Santiago’s Motion To Compel the Government To Elect One Court of the Superseding Indictment [# 267] Because the Indictment is Multiplicitous [# 645],1 filed December 12, 2012. I have considered all relevant adjudicative facts in the file and record of this case and all facts to which there is no express or implied objection. I have considered, but not necessarily…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. John Wesley Morehead, Sr., John Wesley Morehead, Jr., and Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Coyette Deon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.