Legal Opinion

United States v. Santiago

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 19, 2014No. Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00164-REB-01Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT RICHARD SANTIAGO’S MOTION TO COMPEL THE GOVERNMENT TO ELECT ONE COUNT OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT [# 267] BECAUSE THE INDICTMENT IS MULTIPLICITOUS

Blackburn, Judge.

The matter before me is Defendant Richard Santiago’s Motion To Compel the Government To Elect One Court of the Superseding Indictment [# 267] Because the Indictment is Multiplicitous [# 645],1 filed December 12, 2012. I have considered all relevant adjudicative facts in the file and record of this case and all facts to which there is no express or implied objection. I have considered, but not necessarily…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. John Wesley Morehead, Sr., John Wesley Morehead, Jr., and Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Coyette Deon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API