Legal Opinion

Mathiot's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1914No. Appeal, No. 261PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal, No. 261, Oct. T., 1913, by Laura H. Mathiot, from decree of O. O. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 130, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Edward B. Mathiot, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 261, Oct. T., 1913, by Laura H. Mathiot, from decree of O. O. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 130, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Edward B. Mathiot, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. Upon the audit of the account Milleb, J., filed the following opinion: The question is, whether decedent’s present wife can maintain a claim for $15,000.00 received by him from her and used with her knowledge by him to procure a divorce from his former wife, a subsequent marriage between claimant and the decedent being then in contemplation THE FACTS. 1. Doctor Mathiot was…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The decree of the Orphans’ Court is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law by Judge Miller.

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Gillan v. GillanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Dennison v. DennisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API