Legal Opinion

Speciale v. Seybold

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 19, 1996No. 96 C 2993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

This matter arises on plaintiff Kimberly Speeiale’s motion to remand this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the motion of respondent Administrative Committee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates Health and Welfare Fund (“Wal-Mart”) for summary judgment.

I. MOTION TO REMAND

After plaintiff suffered injuries in an automobile accident, she filed this action in the Circuit Court of the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit, Kane County against defendant Katherine Seybold. Plaintiff is a participant in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Varco v. LapsisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  2. Cortez v. Michael Reese Health Plan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Hartenbower v. DentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Hartenbower v. Electrical Specialties Co. Health Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Hartenbower v. ELEC. SPECIALTIES CO. HEALTH BEN. PLANDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API