Hartenbower v. Dent
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALE SLA, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs Milton F. Hartenbower, individually and as guardian of John Hartenbower, a minor, and Catherine Hartenbower’s motion to remand their case to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, the court denies the motion to remand.
I. BACKGROUND
On November 13,1992, defendant Caroline Dent’s vehicle struck John Hartenbower, causing him to suffer multiple injuries. John’s parents, Milton and Catherine Hartenbower, filed a negligence action against Dent.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United of America Bank v. Rabbi Mordecai Elefant, Itri Torah Research Institute and Erwin WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fravel v. StankusDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Varco v. LapsisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001