Legal Opinion

Bernitsky v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are the owners and operators of a small independent coal mine located in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. They seek damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), alleging that defendant, through its duly authorized agents, representatives, servants and employees, did close plaintiffs’ mine on February 13, 1974, and that in or about April of that year, as a proximate cause of said closure, plaintiffs’ mine collapsed, destroying mining tools and equipment and rendering impossible the extraction of 112,000 tons of coal.

The Government…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Vera Zabala Clemente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bernitsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Charles Schindler, and Mary Schindler, Individually and as Next Friend of Karl Michael Schindler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bernitsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Gunnells v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API