Legal Opinion
Charles Schindler, and Mary Schindler, Individually and as Next Friend of Karl Michael Schindler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1981No. 79-1725PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint and amended complaint seeking damages against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80 (FTCA) 1 The gravamen of the claim is that the United States negligently granted a license to a private company for the manufacture of polio vaccine according to a certain formula.
The complaints alleged that employees of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) negligently failed to require Lederle Laboratories, a Division of American Cyanamid Company, to comply with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Flechsig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Cecile Industries, Inc. And John Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Sabin Oral Polio Vaccine Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Viola Moody (84-5479), George D. Bawgus (84-5695) v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.