Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1988No. C86-07-33474; CA A47073PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Under a search warrant procured by telephone, law enforcement officials obtained evidence of manufacture of a controlled substance. The court granted defendant’s motion to suppress, and the state appeals. We reverse and remand.

At 3:10 a.m. on July 24,1986, Deputy Sheriff Sawyer telephoned a district court judge seeking to obtain a search warrant. Pursuant to ORS 133.545(5), Sawyer tape recorded the prepared statement that he read to the judge, after which he stated, “And that’s the affidavit.” At that point, the judge asked him to turn off the tape recorder, and Sawyer complied. When the tape…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API