Barker v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. The policy covered the contents of the dwelling occupied by the insured and the members of his family, including his wife, his dependent son, Bill Barker, 19, and the son’s wife, 18, who constituted the members of the household. At the time the policy was issued all the property later lost by fire was in use by the members of the family in the dwelling in Sparta.
Subsequently, the insured rented an apartment in Ealeigb for the use of bis son and the son’s wife while the son attended classes at State College. the furnishings lost when the Ealeigb…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Roberts v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Chitty v. ChittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Carden v. . CardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. FlanaginSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.