Legal Opinion

Hirshfield v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1890No. 3611PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§177. Occupation tax upon ticket broker by municipal corporation; construction of article 8, section 1, of the constitution; extent of poiuer of municipal corporation to license, tax and regulate occupations; case stated. This appeal attacks the validity of the ordinances of the city of Dallas, under which appellant was convicted in the city court for pursuing the occupation of a ticket broker and scalper without first procuring a license therefor. The ordinances regulating this matter provide: (1) That no person shall pursue the occupation wfithout a license. [Art. 365,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. President of Ottawa v. County of La SalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Ex parte BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Ash v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Byers v. President of OlneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Reed v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Atkins v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Morton v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Ex Parte TownsendCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API