Legal Opinion

Beckert v. Doble

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

These actions were brought under § 3404 of the General Statutes, which provides that “when any dog shall do any damage, either to the body or property of any person, the owner or keeper . . . shall be liable for such damage.” The complaint in each action alleged that the defendant’s dog attacked Mrs. Beckert and knocked her to the ground whereby she suffered injuries, and her testimony was that as she was passing the defendant’s house she felt something hit her, turned and saw the defendant’s dog “up on” her left side, that she lost her balance- “with the weight of him,” fell and became’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Selleck v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Dickerson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Roth v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Crouse v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Daniels v. CelesteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Lockwood v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API