Curran v. Hargreaves
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The plaintiff testified upon the trial as to his athletic activities before the accident and then stated that since the accident he had not taken any part in athletics. This testimony was undoubtedly intended to cause the jury to infer that his injuries were so serious that he was not able to participate in athletic games. Furthermore, the plaintiff, when asked upon the trial to state whether he had any difficulty in walking, answered that he threw out his left leg “ to keep the ankle [knee] from bearing into the other knee and I cannot extend it completely and cannot straighten it completely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Corley v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Brooks v. Rochester Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- Cole v. Fall Brook Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
- Fogel v. . Interborough Rapid Transit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. CrimentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Lindboe v. Syracuse Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940