Legal Opinion

Lindboe v. Syracuse Transit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCross, J.

The question presented arises on a motion for a mistrial upon the stated facts here involved. The action is an ordinary one in negligence. In impaneling the jury plaintiff’s counsel asked a question based on section 452 of the Civil Practice Act as to whether a juror was “ a shareholder, stockholder, director, officer or employee, or in any manner interested, in any insurance company issuing policies for protection against liability for damages for injury to persons or property.” The counsel for the defendants then stated that, in view of such question, he would state to the jury that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loughlin v. . BrassilNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Piechuck v. MagusiakSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Di Tommaso v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Connor v. AllisonNew York Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Senecal v. Hovey, New York County Courts1964
  3. Constable v. MatieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API