Harold Lucie v. Kleen-Leen, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff contends that the district court erred in construing the August 20, 1962 contract in that the district judge failed to allow extrinsic evidence which would have assisted in ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties. The defendant makes the counter argument that the language of the contract is plain and unambiguous and that the intention of the parties must be discerned solely from the language of the instrument itself without resort to extrinsic evidence. The sole issue before us is the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. W.R. Grace & Co. And Grace Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Sunstream Jet Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. International Air Service Co., Ltd., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Battery Steamship Corp. v. Refineria Panama, S. A. And United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.