Legal Opinion
Cammarata v. Sahli
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 17, 1958No. Civ. A. 18086PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNTON, District Judge.
The Court has before it plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint herein. The said motion of plaintiff is brief and is here set forth in its entirety:
“Now comes, Frank Cammarata, by his attorney, Joseph W. Louisell, and moves this Court for a preliminary injunction in this cause to enjoin the defendant Walter Sahli, his agents, officers, employees, successors and deputies and all persons acting through or under him, from enforcing a certain warrant directing the deportation of the plaintiff until the final…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States Ex Rel. Adel v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- In Re CammarataMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Monumental Motor Tours, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.