Legal Opinion

Cammarata v. Sahli

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 17, 1958No. Civ. A. 18086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The Court has before it plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint herein. The said motion of plaintiff is brief and is here set forth in its entirety:

“Now comes, Frank Cammarata, by his attorney, Joseph W. Louisell, and moves this Court for a preliminary injunction in this cause to enjoin the defendant Walter Sahli, his agents, officers, employees, successors and deputies and all persons acting through or under him, from enforcing a certain warrant directing the deportation of the plaintiff until the final…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States Ex Rel. Adel v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. In Re CammarataMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Monumental Motor Tours, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1960
  2. DEFBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
  3. F-G-& C-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API