Legal Opinion

In re Fairbanks Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided April 17, 2019No. CASE NO. 18-41768-PWBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge

A mass tort bankruptcy case involves two groups of tort claimants: present claimants (individuals who know they have been injured) and future claimants (individuals who do not know of their exposure or injury and, therefore, are unknown). A chapter 11 plan can deal with future claims through a so-called "channeling injunction" that prevents them from asserting their claims other than against a trust established under the plan, provided that certain requirements are met. 11 U.S.C. § 524(g).

Present claimants can protect their rights in a chapter 11…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. AT&T Mobility, LLC v. YeagerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
  3. Geddes v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imerys Talc America, Inc v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. In re: Imerys Talc America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  3. The FB Real Estate Holdings Company f/k/a The FairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API