Legal Opinion

Stan Lee Trading, Inc. v. Holtz

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 3, 1986No. CV 84-7616 WJRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Stan Lee Trading, Inc. claims that defendants Chains West, Inc. and Agnes Holtz converted 5603.40 pennyweight (dwt) of fourteen karats fine gold wire that belonged to the plaintiff. 1 The Court has jurisdiction over this controversy due to the diversity of citizenship of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. At the time relevant to this action, Stan Lee Trading, Inc. was a corporation incorporated under the laws of Texas with its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas. Defendant Chains West, Inc. was a corporation incorporated under the laws of California with its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Chase Investment Services Corp. v. Law Offices of Jon Divens & Associates, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. Irving Nelkin & Co. v. South Beverly Hills Wilshire Jewelry & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. John L. Molinaro, and Kurahara & Morrissey, Real Party in Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. John L. Molinaro, and Kurahara & Morrissey, Real Party in Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API