McCauley v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
In each action: Judgment reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated. On this record, we are satisfied that a preponderance of the credible evidence favors the determination made in the Court of Claims. So viewed, it cannot reasonably be said in light of all the surrounding circumstances, including the weather and road conditions and the driver’s conduct, that the fatal happening was due to any neglect, failure or omission of the State to perform a duty owed.
Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Bottalico v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Larkin v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Spriggs v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Terranella v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Marrow v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.