Legal Opinion

Oxendine v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis X. Conlon, J.

This is an application for an order allowing plaintiff to serve a belated notice of claim nunc pro tunc, upon the New York City Housing Authority. The infant plaintiff was 10 years of age at the time of the accident, which occurred on August 29, 1955. A notice of claim was served on the comptroller of the City of New York but not on the New York City Housing Authority. The summons and complaint was served on the housing authority on October 13, 1955, and the authority thereafter appeared in the action. In certain instances the court has discretion in allowing late notices of claim. However,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. School Board of Union Free District No. 28New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Ringgold v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Coyle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Kaplan v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API