Legal Opinion

Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1987No. 86-CA-446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOTHARD, Judge.

This worker’s compensation suit was before us previously. In our opinion, authorized by Rule 2-16.3 of the Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, and handed down January 12, 1987, we affirmed as amended a trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff.1 Therein we stated, in pertinent part:

“... The primary issue is whether Virgil introduced sufficient evidence to prove a disability as a result of the December 7th accident, which would justify an award of 100 weeks of compensation. ...

[[Image here]]

The record reflects that the only testimony was that of the plaintiff and his mother.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Dominick v. CNA Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Dickerson v. Zurich-American Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindon v. Terminix Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. France v. a & M WOOD CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Farque v. McKinneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Ricaud v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Bourque v. Riviana Foods, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API