Brand v. Brand
New York Supreme Court
1868, February 13th, action commenced by service of summons only. 1868, February 14tl), complaint filed, with notice of lis ■pendens. 1868, February 14th, Raynor & Vann appeared for defendants. 1868, Februaiy 29th, twenty days additional'time given to serve a copy of the complaint. 1868, March 12th, copy of complaint served on defendants’ attorneys. 1868, March 28th, defendant William Gr.
Read the full summary
1868, February 13th, action commenced by service of summons only. 1868, February 14tl), complaint filed, with notice of lis ■pendens. 1868, February 14th, Raynor & Vann appeared for defendants. 1868, Februaiy 29th, twenty days additional'time given to serve a copy of the complaint. 1868, March 12th, copy of complaint served on defendants’ attorneys. 1868, March 28th, defendant William Gr. Brand served answer, and Alida Brand served demurrer. 1868, June 23d, at special term, the demurrer dismissed, and the cause referred to Hon. Le Roy Morgan, as sole referee, &c. To the above-named…
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appeal from a judgment rendered for the; defendants on the report of a referee.
The plaintiff is the father of the defendant, William G. Brand. On the 29th day of January, 1868, the plaintiff, who was then seventy-five years old, executed to his son, the defendant, a warrantee deed of his farm, containing about seventy-three acres, situated in the town of Geddes, in the county of Onondaga, of the value of from $6,000 to $7,000, the consideration for which was expressed in the deed1 to be the sum of $5,636.
At the time the deed was executed, there was a mortgage on the north half of the farm,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whiting v. . BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Jackson ex. rel. Cadwell v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- De Witt v. . Barly and SchoonmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Whelan v. WhelanNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Dewitt v. . Barley and SchoonmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stone v. MinterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900