Legal Opinion
Charles E. Michael v. Fred Smith
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 3, 1955No. 12344_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The question is whether a money judgment may be revived by an order of the District Court made after the expiration of 12 years from its date on a motion filed during the 12 year period. 1
On April 22, 1930, Michael, the appellant, obtained a judgment against Smith, the appellee, in the sum of $1,-000. 00. On April 16, 1942, within 12 years, Michael filed a motion in the District Court to renew the judgment, stating that it was valid and existing and in full force and effect. On April 23, 1942, the court, reciting in its order, inter alia, that a copy of the motion had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. BodenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Salvoni v PilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- O'Neill & Co. v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- German Literary Society v. BlochMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Collins v. McBlairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Driscoll v. KonzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- National Bank of Washington v. CarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Massey v. MasseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lee v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.