Legal Opinion

National Bank of Washington v. Carr

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 2003No. 01-CV-1599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

On November 2, 1989, the National Bank of Washington (“National Bank”) obtained a default judgment in the amount of $21,444.44, plus interest, costs, and attorney’s fees, against appellees, George E. Carr and Carr and Company, Inc., on three overdue and unpaid promissory notes. On May 7, 1997, appellant, Bobby D. Associates, obtained an assignment of the National Bank judgment, assuming the position of judgment creditor.1 On October 17, 2001, the judgment creditor filed a motion to revive the National Bank judgment against appellees, which was due to expire on November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mayo v. MayoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Charles E. Michael v. Fred SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Baker v. Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  3. Belkin v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Robertson v. CartinhourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. Williams v. MartinezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API