Legal Opinion

Fama v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1982No. 2257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This action in trespass arises out of injuries that Judy Fama/appellant/minor plaintiff suffered when she was struck by a vehicle driven by Irvin Smith/appellee/defendant. The jury returned a verdict for appellee. 1 Appellant’s motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied. Appellant filed this appeal arguing solely that the court’s charge to the jury was in error. We agree and order a new trial.

The relevant facts are as follows: The accident occurred on a four-lane, divided limited-access highway. Appellant lived with her family in a mobile home…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Slavish v. RatajczakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Buchecker v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. National Products Co. v. Atlas Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Stern v. Vic Snyder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Stong v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API