Fama v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
This action in trespass arises out of injuries that Judy Fama/appellant/minor plaintiff suffered when she was struck by a vehicle driven by Irvin Smith/appellee/defendant. The jury returned a verdict for appellee. 1 Appellant’s motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied. Appellant filed this appeal arguing solely that the court’s charge to the jury was in error. We agree and order a new trial.
The relevant facts are as follows: The accident occurred on a four-lane, divided limited-access highway. Appellant lived with her family in a mobile home…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Slavish v. RatajczakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Buchecker v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- National Products Co. v. Atlas Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Stern v. Vic Snyder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Stong v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003