Legal Opinion

Meoli v. American Medical Services of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 11, 1999No. 97CV1222 BTM(JAH)Published

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING COUN-TERDEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on counterdefendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, does not accord an ERISA fiduciary the right to seek indemnity from a co-fiduciary for breach of fiduciary duty. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

I. Background

This case involves employee benefit plans (collectively “Plans”) 1 covered by ERISA. Plaintiff Mike Meoli,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Kim v. FujikawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API