Meoli v. American Medical Services of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING COUN-TERDEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on counterdefendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, does not accord an ERISA fiduciary the right to seek indemnity from a co-fiduciary for breach of fiduciary duty. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
I. Background
This case involves employee benefit plans (collectively “Plans”) 1 covered by ERISA. Plaintiff Mike Meoli,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Kim v. FujikawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.