State v. Mathe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
Petitioner Leslie Mathe seeks review of his conviction on two counts of first degree robbery while armed with a deadly weapon and firearm. Petitioner alleges the convictions are based on evidence seized illegally during a search of his bedroom. The Court of Appeals held the search was valid because it was authorized by the consent of a third party — petitioner's landlord. We hold that the landlord did not have authority to consent to a search of petitioner's room. We conclude, however, that the in-court identifications were made independent of the violation of petitioner's Fourth Amendment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.