Legal Opinion

State v. Mathe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1984No. 49999-3PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

Petitioner Leslie Mathe seeks review of his conviction on two counts of first degree robbery while armed with a deadly weapon and firearm. Petitioner alleges the convictions are based on evidence seized illegally during a search of his bedroom. The Court of Appeals held the search was valid because it was authorized by the consent of a third party — petitioner's landlord. We hold that the landlord did not have authority to consent to a search of petitioner's room. We conclude, however, that the in-court identifications were made independent of the violation of petitioner's Fourth Amendment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API