Legal Opinion

State v. Morse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2005No. 75915-4PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution, warrantless searches are per se unreasonable. Exceptions to the warrant requirement are jealously and carefully drawn. Properly obtained, consent to a warrantless search is one of those carefully drawn exceptions. Although Robert James Morse was at home, police gained entry into his apartment by obtaining the consent of a houseguest who, with her husband, had been at Morse’s apartment for only five days. The police did not have a search warrant, were looking for another person, and did not obtain Morse’s permission to search his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API