Legal Opinion

Reed v. Iowa Marine & Repair Corp.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided August 11, 1992No. 90-4971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions of defendant Iowa Marine Repair Corp. After notice, briefing, testimony, and argument on the motion, as well as supplemental briefing and further supplementation of the record with respect to certain discovery matters, the Court finds the motion to be well taken, though not for the reasons given by the movant. The Court therefore grants the motion and refers the question of the precise amount of the sanction to be imposed to the Magistrate Judge for further findings.

I. Facts

Shelby Reed hired Richard Barker to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Reed v. Iowa Marine and Repair Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Wallace Boudreaux v. Transocean Deepwater, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Gibbs v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Wallace Boudreaux v. Transocean Deepwater, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API