Legal Opinion
Lavrov v. NCR Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 20, 1984No. C-3-82-275PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS; ORDER BIFURCATING ISSUES FOR TRIAL; CONFERENCE CALL SET TO DETERMINE IF EXISTING TRIAL DATE CAN BE MET ON NARROW ISSUE SET FORTH BELOW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO SET NEW TRIAL DATE ON BIFURCATED BASIS
RICE, District Judge.
In 1976, Defendant NCR Corporation (“NCR”) employed Plaintiff Christine Lavrov as a system support analyst at its San Francisco office. During November, 1976, Plaintiff served as a guide and interpreter for a visiting Soviet delegation. Subsequently, Plaintiff began pursuing employment with NCR’s International Division where she could…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985