Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose M. Castillo, A/K/A Richard Lara, A/K/A Daniel

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 19, 2002No. 01-1010PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant José Castillo appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for a Franks hearing. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). Castillo alleges and hopes to establish that the magistrate judge relied on an affidavit that omitted facts material to a probable cause determination underlying the issuance of a search warrant. Disagreeing with that contention, we affirm.

I

On May 25, 1999, Lawrence police officers applied for a warrant to search the second floor apartment at 214 High Street in Lawrence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., United States of America v. Helen HadfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Morales-CastroDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
  3. United States v. ReinerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. TanguayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API