House Cold Tire Setter Co. v. Whitehurst
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN beard on appeal from a justice’s court, before Lyon, J., and a jury, at April Term, 1908, of Edgecombe. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.'
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
This was an action to recover on certain notes given by defendant to plaintiff for tbe purcbase price of one or more “cold tire setter” machines bought by defendant of plaintiff, the manufacturer, through its agents, the Eulford Hardware Company, of Washington, N. 0. It does not distinctly appear from the record whether there were one or more of these machines or whether they were No. 1 or No. 2; nor does this seem to be a matter of importance. Defendant answered by way of defense that the notes sued on were given by him for the purchase price of a certain “cold. tire setter” machine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. CochranMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cranston Print Works Company, a Corporation v. Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Jones v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Harper v. Town of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Raulf v. Elizabeth City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.