Legal Opinion

E. O. Hall & Son, Ltd. v. Dickey

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ORIGINAL.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

(Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent as District Magistrate of Honolulu to issue execution, pending an appeal to the Circuit Court, in a cause wherein the respondent gave judgment for the plaintiff, the present petitioner, for the sum of $309.40. The Magistrate, although finding that good cause was shown for the issuance of the execution pending the appeal, denied plaintiff’s motion for such execution ■on the sole ground that Sec. 11 of Chap. 57 of the Laws of 1892, .as amended by Sec. 17 of Act 32 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. RedhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Chow v. DickeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Honolulu Iron Works Co. v. HaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In re the Tax Appeal of Amco Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API