Legal Opinion
Darling v. Purdom
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 16, 1914No. 5490PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Certiorari; from Pierce superior court — Judge Quiucey. February 14, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRoan, J.
Purdom, administrator of the estate of W. M. Gaddy, sued E. L. Darling in a justice’s court for $35, the alleged value of one set of harness, a horse blanket, and a saddle, alleged to be property of the said estate. From the evidence it appears that these articles were in the possession of the defendant. As to how they came into his possession the evidence in the record is silent. The administrator learned that they were in the possession of Darling, and went to see him, and Darling admitted having them, and that he had no claim on them. Thereupon the administrator told Darling that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bates v. BigbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Morris Storage & Transfer Co. v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Express Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- DeLoach Mill Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. FitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Dispeker v. New Southern Hotel CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Potomac Ins. Co. v. NicksonUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Central Meat Market v. Longwell's Transfer, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- White v. American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936