Legal Opinion
Potomac Ins. Co. v. Nickson
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1924No. 4171PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The Potomac Insurance Company, hereinafter called plaintiff, commenced this action as the assignee of one W. R. Wallace to recover judgment against the defendant who conducted a public garage in Ogden City, Utah. W. R. Wallace was a party to the action when it was commenced, but during the course of the trial he was dismissed from the action, and the trial proceeded with the insurance company as the sole plaintiff. Wallace is therefore eliminated from the case.
The complaint contains many explanatory statements together with much unnecessary evidentiary and surplus matters. It must suffice to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Kowing v. . ManlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Knights v. PiellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pacific Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Murray v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- BD. OF ED. OF JORDAN SCH. DIST. v. HalesUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Dispeker v. New Southern Hotel CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Bolte v. Aits, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Security Union Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.