Legal Opinion
Westcott Hosiery Mills v. Rich's, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 13, 1932No. Nos. 584, 585PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNDERWOOD, District Judge.
The issues and the law in these cases are substantially the same, and, by agreement of the parties, the cases were tried together.
The suits are founded on alleged infringements by defendants of United States letters patent No. 1,759,561, granted to David H. Young, assignor to plaintiff, on May 29, 1939, for a knitted fabric and a knitted stocking composed of lustrous counter-twisted yam. Defendants Rich’s, Inc., and J. Regenstein Company are sued as retail dealers in the alleged infringing articles, and defendants Julius Kayser & Co., Inc., and J. R. Beaton Co.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- General Electric Co. v. Hoskins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Derby v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- O. K. Jelks & Son v. Tom Huston Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. Roxbury Distilling Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Westcott Hosiery Mills v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933