Legal Opinion

In re Pfliger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 2012No. A12-1014Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On June 5, 2012, the last day of the filing period for elective office, petitioner Jesse Pfliger filed with the Secretary of State’s office an affidavit of candidacy as the Republican candidate for Minnesota State Senate, District 61. Minnesota Statutes § 204B.06, subd. lb (2010), requires, among other things, that an affidavit of candidacy include “a telephone number where the candidate can be contacted.” Id., subd. lb(a). Pfliger’s affidavit of candidacy did not include the required telephone number. After the Secretary of State’s office notified Pfliger that his affidavit had been…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. State ex rel. O'Hearn v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Rolvaag v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Paquin v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API