Legal Opinion · Dissent

1ST NAT. BK. of MILLVILLE v. Horwatt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 14Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

Appellant’s judgment against appellee was opened by the lower court on the basis that the facts alleged in the petition to open and supported by the testimony taken in the depositions showed that appellee had a good defense against plaintiff’s claim. I fail to see *592the presence of such a defense. Appellee’s petition to open appears to be based entirely upon the proposition that appellee was deprived of a certificate of title to the motor vehicle involved because C. D. Wesley, presumably the owner of the Wesley Auto Company, Inc., removed from the mail an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Weigelt v. Factors Credit Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Ertel v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Philips v. Bank of LewistownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  5. Speck Cadillac-Olds, Inc. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API