1ST NAT. BK. of MILLVILLE v. Horwatt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Montgomery, J.:
Appellant’s judgment against appellee was opened by the lower court on the basis that the facts alleged in the petition to open and supported by the testimony taken in the depositions showed that appellee had a good defense against plaintiff’s claim. I fail to see *592the presence of such a defense. Appellee’s petition to open appears to be based entirely upon the proposition that appellee was deprived of a certificate of title to the motor vehicle involved because C. D. Wesley, presumably the owner of the Wesley Auto Company, Inc., removed from the mail an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Weigelt v. Factors Credit Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Ertel v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Philips v. Bank of LewistownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
- Speck Cadillac-Olds, Inc. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.