United States v. Melot (Katherine)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.
The district court sanctioned Mrs. Katherine L. Melot and Mr. Billy R. Melot based on the court’s inherent authority. The Melots appeal and seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and address the merits of the appeal.
This appeal requires examination of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, which requires notice and an opportunity to be heard. In light of these requirements, a court considering sanctions must give the sanctioned party notice and an opportunity to be heard. Here, the court supplied notice that it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Jimenez v. Health Net, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Ted Lapidus, S.A. v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Hutchinson (Godlove) v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Sakon v. AndreoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casasola v. Control Systems International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Corral v. Concho Resources, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2022