Legal Opinion

Dawson v. National Bank of Greenville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

It is admitted in the pleadings in this action that the check dated 21 October, 1926, drawn by Moye & Gentry, and payable to the order of plaintiffs, was presented for payment to defendant, the drawee bank, without endorsement, during the day on which it was drawn; and that the defendant bank paid the proceeds of said check to the person who made such presentment and charged the amount thereof to the account of the drawer. The only issue of fact arising upon the pleadings is as to whether presentment was made by, and payment made to plaintiffs, or to some person authorized by them to make…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Standard Trust Co. of New York v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Hawes v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Commercial National Bank v. First National Bank of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General American Life Insurance v. StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Modern Homes Construction Co. v. Tryon Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Dawson v. National Bank of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Modern Homes Construction Co. v. Tryon Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API