Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Eckert

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 22, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 N.J. Super. 220 (1952)

91 A.2d 633

HAZEL C. VOGEL AND HARRY VOGEL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS,

v.

RALPH H. ECKERT AND EDNA ECKERT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 6, 1952.

Decided October 22, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Clark Vogel argued the cause for plaintiff-appellants (Messrs. Wise & Wise, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Coult argued the cause for defendant-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered at the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Guilford v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Lordi v. SpiottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Cosgrave v. MalstromSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  5. Lewis v. DearSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mistretta v. AlessiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Cropanese v. MartinezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Pearlstein v. LeedsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. KNOX EX REL. KNOX v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API