Legal Opinion
United States v. Clark
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided February 4, 1994No. 4:93-CR-130-YPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant REUBEN F. CLARK’s (“Clark”) motion to dismiss, filed December 7, 1993. After careful consideration of said motion, response, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED.
On November 4, 1993, Clark was indicted for conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 2312 & 2313, and for 23 violations of those statutes. Section 2312 makes it a crime to transport “in interstate or foreign commerce a motor vehicle ... knowing the same to have been stolen....”…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Norman ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Reuben F. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995