Legal Opinion

Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1978No. 77-1474Published

1Opinion

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The petition for rehearing en banc in the above case is denied by four of the judges voting in favor of the denial. Three of the judges vote in favor of the rehearing en banc.

LAY, Circuit Judge, joined by HEANEY and STEPHENSON, would grant the petition for rehearing en banc for the following reasons:

The panel’s decision denying standing to an individual consumer under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 (1976), is contrary to the rationale of Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of Atlanta, 203 U.S. 390, 27 S.Ct. 65, 51 L.Ed. 241 (1906) and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Pfizer Inc. v. Government of IndiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. John M. Cleary v. O. Roy ChalkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API