Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Leaptrot
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undbrcobler, Justice.
1. “Mutual wills may be defined as the separate wills of two persons which are reciprocal in their provisions.” Lampkin v. Edwards, 222 Ga. 288, 290 (149 SE2d 708). See Webb v. Smith, 220 Ga. 809 (141 SE2d 899); Couch v. Wood, 156 Ga. 626 (119 SE 691). “Mutual wills result from a mutual intention on the part of the makers thereof to make reciprocal testamentary gifts.” Lampkin v. Edwards, supra. The wills in the instant- case are mutual. Not only are the provisions reciprocal but the makers specifically stated their intentions that “the two wills are expressly executed as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nye v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Lampkin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Webb v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Robbins v. RialesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kerper v. KerperWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Carr v. KupferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Rigby v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Hutson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Hodges v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.