Legal Opinion

Somers Coal Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 6, 1942No. 19179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKIN, District Judge.

After the filing of the opinion overruling the motion for summary judgment and sustaining the motion to dismiss, counsel for defendant submitted findings of fact and conclusions of law, and counsel for plaintiff filed objections to defendant’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and submitted substitutes. The court declines to approve either set of proposed findings and declines to make findings of fact. Since the case was submitted upon the motions, pleadings, and stipulation of *533facts, it cannot be said that the case was “tried upon the facts”, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  3. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Lucking v. DelanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moncier v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
  3. S. S. Hepworth Co. v. Western States Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API